Attack on Iraq [Archive] - Gamers Gateway

Scott

02-05-2003, 09:51 PM

Originally posted by nemesis01
I agree with it yes, he is obviously a total nutcase and even if he has no weapons which he obviously has then I would do everything I had to to get rid of him. :rolleyes: I agree with him being a nutcase, but it's stupid going after him in Iraq, is he using any weapons against anyone when there is no war? No he isn't.

Say Iraq is invaded and some important people were killed, then if he does have weapons they will obviously then be used against everyone, I say don't provoke what isn't harming us just now, but if they were to make the first move then go get them, but I think it's stupid to invade them at the moment.

Flame me all you like but that's what I think is the most sensible thing to do.

PS2gaz

02-05-2003, 09:55 PM

Originally posted by Genesis
Kill the f00kers!

I completely agree with you

Blondi

02-05-2003, 10:01 PM

Originally posted by Genesis
Kill the f00kers!

All I am going to say (because I don't want this to turn into the flamming match thread I started in August about Bin Laden) is that I agree with Genesis.........

Scott

02-05-2003, 10:44 PM

You kill the important guys in Iraq, what do you think will then happen? :wtf: :rolleyes:

Obviously they will react by the use of nuclear weapons, people don't realize that you have to be delicate when the world IS AT RISK.

Revolver-Ocelot

02-05-2003, 10:46 PM

Will yes he's a nutcase but war is never good. Innocent people will die and as of late Saddam hasn't done anything to warrant a war.

Plus the American government isn't the most stable in the world god knows what there doing behind closed doors developing new virus, new weapons all the time that goes from UK aswell don't see them opening up there doors to the world do ya?

Nope didn't think so...:wtf:

Scott

02-05-2003, 10:54 PM

Originally posted by Revolver-Ocelot
Will yes he's a nutcase but war is never good. Innocent people will die and as of late Saddam hasn't done anything to warrant a war.

Plus the American government isn't the most stable in the world god knows what there doing behind closed doors developing new virus, new weapons all the time that goes from UK aswell don't see them opening up there doors to the world do ya?

Nope didn't think so...:wtf:

Well said. :cool:

Chappers

02-05-2003, 11:05 PM

i say leave the guy, as scott said hes not doing anything atm so leave him be be on standby ready for something, but lets not destroy him, i mean hes got loads of peeps willing to die for him once hes ded do u think there just gonna stop and say yay, there gonna attack us all and try and destroy us.

Glure

02-05-2003, 11:21 PM

First of all, we're not gunna use nukes unless we dont have a choice because we all remember what happened the last time we used them. If we have reason to believe they will attack first, then yes, we should do something, but other than that, let them play god in their own country.

Krome

02-06-2003, 12:46 AM

I agree with Genisis, Kill the f00kers. Then head for north Korea.

Chappers

02-06-2003, 12:55 AM

oh ffs, why!!!!! now whos looking for a fight, north korea are doing **** all why bother them :wtf:

Loop

02-06-2003, 02:33 AM

Must we wait for the "smoking glove" before we realise all weapons must be removed?
Put them all on the Moon, I say. Create a Planetary Defence System.

World Leaders need to be intelligent enough to realise we can't keep fighting amongst ourselves like we are.
No, we must seek out new life and new civilisations. And kill them.

Saurion

02-06-2003, 02:53 AM

I don't think that a war on Iraq is a good idea. I mean, if they start a war on Iraq, Iraq will probably react by using their weapons.

And now in these days, every important country has nuclear power. They have bombs, warheads, etc all pointed at eachother.

If they (Iraq) launch just one nuke, the USA and allies will begin launching theirs, causing a nuclear worldwide holacaust.

The dust will be so thick, it would block the sunlight; causing a nuclear winter.

In a nuclear winter, as the name implies, it is cold. No sunlight = dead frozen people.

If we have no sunlight, it will kill all the vegetation, if any. With no vegetation, no animals can live. We would die all because of a single war.

(looks up at the words that came from his mind :D)

Also, a war on Iraq would affect global economy (maybe not global, but probably on most countries). Expert economists say that, with a war on Iraq, the price of the dollar in Chile might go up to 1000 pesos (years ago, it used to be 500). Oil price would raise too. No offense to my fellow people, but we Chileans have a below-average country (in terms of development). We mostly depend on dollars and oil. Without these important stuff, Chile wouldn't exist. And many other not-so-developed countries, too.

Well, I think I just got a bit off-topic. Forget the stuff I said about economy. ~.~

(don't j00 flamez0rz meh, I just got inspired in my foolishness and typed all of the above :P)

Luminar

02-06-2003, 11:34 AM

I do think an attack on Iraq is also a goos idea!!!

Lazarous56

02-06-2003, 11:47 AM

I'm not sure. We have 'DON'T ATTACK IRAQ' protesters near me but I don't really care.

Whatvere happens, happens.

Live for the moment thats what I say :)

Luminar

02-06-2003, 12:02 PM

Protesters!!! I really dislike protesters, most of the time they do not have a clue what they are saying, and signing potitons...that are they going to do!!!

galoku

02-06-2003, 12:06 PM

Put them all on the Moon, I say.
Wouldn't that make the moon the grand prize for all the nutters in the world? I mean "yahooo! go to the moon to colect your free nuclear weapons!"....:head:
As for war.. i have mixed opinions.. so i cant really says whether it is good or not to remove Saddam hussein.
http://www.buko.info/bilder/saddam.jpg

Saurion

02-06-2003, 03:14 PM

Originally posted by Luminar
I do think an attack on Iraq is also a goos idea!!!

Do not take the power of war too lightly. It will probably affect economy. Maybe not enough to leave the countries without money, but possibly enough to cause them have severe economic problems. Also, why do you want a war on Iraq? Do you really have a good reason to attack Iraq? Or do you just want them to retaliate and launch their weapons against the world (countries, not the planet)?

EDIT: Nice pic galoku :D

widow_maker

02-06-2003, 04:44 PM

Attacking Iraq isnt a good idea coz it will start World War 3 and then everyone will suffer!

x-chriz

02-06-2003, 06:14 PM

i really dont care weather they start a war. the world need a war. the world always has need wars to reduce the population. i know this may sound harsh but there are too many people in the world and those that cause anger and conflict and want a war should be killed before they kill us. they dont care, they killed lots of americans in the twin towers incident and they did that with out any warning and what did america do? F**K ALL!

Scott

02-06-2003, 07:30 PM

Originally posted by Saurion
[B]I don't think that a war on Iraq is a good idea. I mean, if they start a war on Iraq, Iraq will probably react by using their weapons.

And now in these days, every important country has nuclear power. They have bombs, warheads, etc all pointed at eachother.

If they (Iraq) launch just one nuke, the USA and allies will begin launching theirs, causing a nuclear worldwide holacaust.

The dust will be so thick, it would block the sunlight; causing a nuclear winter.

In a nuclear winter, as the name implies, it is cold. No sunlight = dead frozen people.

If we have no sunlight, it will kill all the vegetation, if any. With no vegetation, no animals can live. We would die all because of a single war./B]

Very Very good points there. :D
Never thought of that, but it's true.

Saurion

02-06-2003, 07:42 PM

Good point x-chriz, I somewhat agree with that too.

NOTE: Not trying to be offensive on the next. Don't read it if you're sensible to any somewhat-rude comments.

However, about the Twin Towers attack...I don't really believe that Bush really cared for the dead and their families. I think he cared about the money lost because of that. I mean, why would you be worried of a death that happened to someone who you don't even know? Also, lots of Americans (and not Americans, too) die every day all around the world. Does Bush do a speech for each person that dies? No. As for me, I DO CARE about other people's death, but I don't do memorials for them or go to their funerals. (that only applies for people I don't know, of course)

Anyhow, I might be wrong (and possibly are) with what I said about Bush caring for the money, not the families.

And to Blondi: Don't feel bad about the flame war that was started on that other 'attack on iraq' topic, it wasn't your fault. It was me and my friends fault. Me, for letting him know my account's password. Him, for posting the rude comments about 9/11. There, you can express yourself FREELY now :)

Monstergamer

02-06-2003, 11:09 PM

i say let get him before he gets us
i am sick of hearing about all the different kinds of wepons he has
i am not ready to go to war but if he dose not stop i say we should do somthing

could you see what iraq would be like, if he was not the leader any more

Revolver-Ocelot

02-06-2003, 11:35 PM

But you attack Iraq for no good reason and there ISN'T a good reason yet. All the muslum (sp) countries are gonna gang up on America which is the beginning of WWIII (the nuclear war).

NK and Iraq are both strong Oil countries and that is the main reason for the attacks.

Monstergamer

02-06-2003, 11:39 PM

Originally posted by Revolver-Ocelot
But you attack Iraq for no good reason and there ISN'T a good reason yet. All the muslum (sp) countries are gonna gang up on America which is the beginning of WWIII (the nuclear war).

NK and Iraq are both strong Oil countries and that is the main reason for the attacks. i mean i dont want to go to war with any one
yes i agree that we need a good reason to go to war.
but i dont want to get attact first like 9-11
the oil is the only reason we should work some thing out

Parasite

02-07-2003, 05:26 AM

I think US thinks it can bully people around. It wont work always. Against Bin Laden, it was "you are with us or against us". Its pretty ****ty IMO. If country is neutral and doesnt want to take any sides, but the country US wants to attack shares a border with my country, the people will say not to allow US soldiers into the country coz they dont want anything to do with war. So, then the US says that my country is aginast them, and threatens to attack us if we dont co-operate with them.

Against Saddam, i dont think US should attack unless it has full support. Now, its one nutcase(Saddam) against another(Bush) with a butt-kisser(Blair). Are all the intelligent people in the opposition?
He is no real threat now, so why start a war?
US says it has great sattilites and other stuff that can even see the car registration number, why not use it keep Saddam in check?(This can be beaten, but i dont think Iraqi Intelligence can think of it)
Already arab people and angry that US soldiers are in their land...if they start a war, it will only provoke them. And Saddam can even try to convince North Korea to join them in the war saying after Iraq its Korea next...then it will definetly go to a III World War.

Revolver-Ocelot

02-07-2003, 11:28 AM

Will Bush will never have full surport France and Germany are already strongly against the attack and others are sure to follow.

Hopefully Blair will can't kicked out before a war starts and a new prime will listen to what the people actually want (I can wish)...

Think of this if it get's to out of hand nearly everyone here on the boards between 18-45? will have to go to war and fight (do you want that??) and 16/17 too if it goes on longer enough and they reach 18 hmmm... :mad:

Wolfy

02-07-2003, 06:17 PM

aight last weekend we had a skool trip 2 france, went down 2 Somme coz of the we're doin war literature 4 english [WWI]. u don't even know how many graves we saw... not just of the french but of the english, australian and german... and thats just the bodies or parts of bodies that were recovered. we went to the places that they fought, the canalz and the fields, seein both the allies and the enemy defenses - we saw so much over a 2 day period that openz ur eyez 2 how pointless but deadly war is.
we saw the encriptionz on the graves, there was 1 that said "some day we'll understand"
but we haven't, that man fought and gave up his life wiv the faith and the hope that we would all learn and understand what war does to every1, but almost 100 years later we haven't learnt. if u lot ever saw the vast numberz of men that gave up their lives..
war isn't good. no i don't fink that any1 should go 2 war. no nukes, no nuffin.
n did any1 hear that korea mite iniate a war wiv US aswell? coz US is in their space n if korea suspects anyfin goin on then they'll start a war wiv the US wivout waitin 4 the 1st move from them. [sorry if the detailz r inaccurate but alot woz happenin when heard the news] n that korea does has weaponz, they have enough plutonium 2 create warheads n stuf and that they will use them. also that turkey will not ally wiv the US if there woz a war - also if US does go 2 war, then the UK, bein itz ally, will go 2 war aswell. this isn't like WWI where tankz were just bein introduced and people used gas, n ain't like WWII either, the stakes r higher now coz technologyz bekum 2 advanced 4 war now, therez 2 much chemical warfare - the results would b more disastrous 4 every1 all round.
itz 2 wrong.

x-chriz

02-07-2003, 06:55 PM

i agree and i think that we need to cut down on using everything! that what the war would be about. cos we have no oil and the east has quite alot. this is a great oppertunity for the british and us to realize that we need to start thinking about what we are doing and to cut down on usage of things, like the oil. we have used up all of ours and we want more so we take it from another country. i can see why there saying no! so what im saying is that the brits and us need to stop advancing in ways which we cannot afford to and start thinking of what we can do to stop conflict and war and how to reduce the usage of materials on earth!

this is just one of my opinions and i have lots more. i think that if the world realises what is happening then something might help, but untill the usa president and the british government gets their head out of their arse and wake up and smeel the coffee then only bad will happen! also the government always say that the publics opinion matters! well it might not always be correct. plus they dont even listen! we are all just a number to them. they just say that they listen to get respect and authority! they dont care!

the world is going down and no one can stop it no matter how many discussions there are! no one will listen and if they do they dont take any notice!

THE WORLD IS GONNA GET KILLED BY US HUMANS!
--------------------------
end of story!

Sman25000

02-08-2003, 12:11 AM

Yes but there will always be psychos who will want war, you can't stop it, just like there will always be criminals, unless we come up with some futuristic system like you'd see on minority report

x-chriz

02-08-2003, 05:11 PM

yes, but we can cut down on the amount of bad people that their are in the world because if we improve community spirit, it might help. be nice to people!

da_masta

02-08-2003, 06:16 PM

Originally posted by x-chriz
i agree and i think that we need to cut down on using everything! that what the war would be about. cos we have no oil and the east has quite alot. this is a great oppertunity for the british and us to realize that we need to start thinking about what we are doing and to cut down on usage of things, like the oil. we have used up all of ours and we want more so we take it from another country. i can see why there saying no! so what im saying is that the brits and us need to stop advancing in ways which we cannot afford to and start thinking of what we can do to stop conflict and war and how to reduce the usage of materials on earth!

this is just one of my opinions and i have lots more. i think that if the world realises what is happening then something might help, but untill the usa president and the british government gets their head out of their arse and wake up and smeel the coffee then only bad will happen! also the government always say that the publics opinion matters! well it might not always be correct. plus they dont even listen! we are all just a number to them. they just say that they listen to get respect and authority! they dont care!

the world is going down and no one can stop it no matter how many discussions there are! no one will listen and if they do they dont take any notice!

THE WORLD IS GONNA GET KILLED BY US HUMANS!
--------------------------
end of story!

U GOD DAMN RIGHT and sadam isn't all the US say he is im british but my mum and dad come from pakistan and iv met sadaam hussain. yeah he might have nuclear and chemical weapons but doesn't the US and britain and whos the only country to ever use nuclear weapons the US in japan so countries should b moaning at the US and trying to disarm them if the want to disarm iraq.

Sman25000

02-09-2003, 02:48 AM

nobodies even gonna do anything with nuclear weapons unless they want to destroy the world, i bet that if one nuke is sent off we're gonna start a nuclear war.

Fatman

02-09-2003, 08:11 AM

Originally posted by Sman25000
nobodies even gonna do anything with nuclear weapons unless they want to destroy the world, i bet that if one nuke is sent off we're gonna start a nuclear war.
chances are that if someone someone sets off 1 nuke your going to be dead anyway cause apparently you live in wasington, which either there or new york they would set off a bomb

MA-121

02-09-2003, 10:18 PM

Exactly how far does the shockwave go?

David

02-09-2003, 11:33 PM

for a nuclear bomb it could easily take out a whole city.

MA-121

02-10-2003, 12:46 AM

Honestly I don't believe anyone is going to launch a nuke at any time, we'll probably die of an asteriod collision before that ever happens. But that's just my guess.

Night_Cralwer

02-10-2003, 01:39 AM

well the next WW will be nukes, there is no doubt about it. they wouldnt make them other wise..

i am all for an attack on iraq as there leadder has shown that he will use them as he done before, and that was on his own people i doubt he would hesatate using them agenst others..

but given this, USA shouldnt have them eather they set a bad example they have signed the same treaty as all the others but the USA have nukes they are even willing to use them 2. this is one of the main reasons that other nations want to have them USA shouls also be told to rid themselfs of such deadly weapons..

as for korea they WILL invade USA it is just a matter of time, and they will win. in this they will control the world. this was for told by notrusdamnis(spelling) that the red army with over 5 billion fighters will start and win the WW3..

i am not a firm believer of this, but it is looking more and more likey with each passing day.

MA-121

02-10-2003, 01:45 AM

Don't believe in anything Nostradamus wrote, that's a bunch of bull****.:rolleyes:

Night_Cralwer

02-10-2003, 01:50 AM

eather do i really... but it just looks that way

MA-121

02-10-2003, 02:27 AM

I remember when some idiots were making a big deal out of Nostradamus's predictions when 9/11 occured, and I doubt that the Koreans are going to try and invade us anytime soon. They are just pissed off because Bush is going on and on about their facilities, I don't blame them. In fact I think he should keep his mouth shut about it. So in conclusion, ignore Nostradamus the crackhead.:rolleyes:

Fatman

02-10-2003, 06:03 AM

actually i think something similar to the 9/11 event occured in one of Tom Clancys Books

MA-121

02-10-2003, 06:09 AM

That's called coincidence.:wtf:

Fatman

02-10-2003, 06:31 AM

yeah i know but they could of used that plan, if they could read Unglish

Monstergamer

02-10-2003, 04:50 PM

i thought the shockwave went 100 to 150 miles
but i am not sure
if so it would barly hit me if they bombed the white house

Scott

02-10-2003, 05:28 PM

Originally posted by Fatman
actually i think something similar to the 9/11 event occured in one of Tom Clancys Books

There's a rap group called "The Coup" who had an album out in late 2000 I think it was with the album cover them infront on the WTC, with the WTC having a plane stuck right in it. :wtf:

Coincidences are freaky! :wtf:

Revolver-Ocelot

02-10-2003, 11:38 PM

dude that's freaky not to lighten up the feel but if you have that album keep it. It'll be worth abit in the future.

Scott

02-11-2003, 12:24 AM

http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/images/coup.jpg

dizturbed

02-11-2003, 02:10 AM

the main reason bish is going into iraq is for the oil, his father runs an oil company and he/america wants control,they wont use nuclear weapons because they claim to be a democratic government,although 60% of americans are against the war they are still going forward, no offence to americans and i know a fe and they are not all like this, but america is like the school ground bully, it has the military might, not intelligence and there fore will do anything it wants.and bush should have signed the kyoto agreement!

saphireruby

02-11-2003, 04:03 PM

:cry: NO NUKES......I wish NO COUNTRY HAD THEM......War will cause further instability in an already instable region, worsen the US economy, not to mention the loss of life that is always a waste.....

MentaL

02-11-2003, 04:15 PM

why dont they dethrone him??

Sman25000

02-12-2003, 04:01 AM

I think i've said this before but i truly think saddam doesn't care if he dies, so he isn't afraid of nukes and stuff. Korea is probably just bluffing so they won't do anything probably. This is just my opinionn though. I am for the war if saddam keeps being all secret and stuff, but otherwise, killing people isn't the solution

Losvaize

02-24-2003, 09:16 PM

Oh man, i just found this, and i'm gonna restart it, well i think...:rolleyes:

Who cares, all americans are for it cause when georgie porgy's finished, everyone else will be dead.

dizturbed

02-24-2003, 11:09 PM

before the us gave "proof"(i doubt its credibility) only 40% were for the war, since the evidence its 60%, thats not all americans.

Scott

02-24-2003, 11:13 PM

Yeh, I saw something about a figure too, in UK.. 91% are against going to war I think it is.

MA-121

02-25-2003, 12:15 AM

Who cares, all americans are for it
No they are not, some are protesting against it and I sure hope more join in the protests.

amalhyatt

02-25-2003, 11:17 AM

i obviously am totally against the war all the way. because innocent ppl will get killed, noth here and over there, and also since my sountyr (syria) is right beside Iraq, it might get into the fight as well. and i relly would not like that to happen. :cry: i say bush should just kidnap sadam and do whatever he wants with him, but not try to start a damn war. he wants to start this damn war to finish what his father started,and also so that he can get re-elected. the arab ppl wont care about what happens to sadam, in fact most will be happy, and believe me, i knoe, im arab. and most yall ppl here allready knew that

Scott

02-25-2003, 11:47 AM

Kidnapping him will only make things worse. :rolleyes:

Revolver-Ocelot

02-25-2003, 02:38 PM

Aye. There were all those protesters in NYC aswell... not many people want this war apart from the higher up people...

Two things will come of this war lots of innocent American/British and Iraq... people will die. Soldiers are doing what they are told they haven't much choice...and america will get lots of oil.

Plus Saddam will most likely get away anyhow...